NEWS
QUICK ACCESS
Looking beyond veil


16 October 2006
THE unsavoury row over the Muslim veil has deepened in the UK with a senior member of the Tony Blair government calling for the sack of a schoolteacher for wearing the veil. Phil Woolas, the minister for local government and community cohesion, has joined the ongoing heated debate over the veil by insisting that Aishah Azmi, the 24-year old mother of two, "has put herself in a position where she cannot do her job."

Coming on the heels of the controversy sparked by former British foreign secretary Jack Straw’s absurd remarks on the Muslim veil, Aishah Azmi’s case has come to challenge Britain’s famed traditions of religious tolerance and multiculturalism. For ages, persecuted and freedom-loving people from around the world have headed to Britain seeing it as a land of freedom, peace and opportunity. It was rightly celebrated as the most liberal and tolerant country in the whole of Europe.

But the very fact that Britain should be debating whether Muslim women can practise their religion, shows that the country is undergoing an alarming change, with the rest of the West.

The far from liberal remarks made by Woolas and before him by Jack Straw are a clear sign that the freedom once enjoyed by religious and cultural minorities in Britain may not last long. If this is how senior leaders of the left-wing Labour party view the country’s largest minority, it is not hard to imagine the possible reaction of right-wing fringe groups such as UKIP.

It is not as if Straw does not understand the larger issue of Muslim identity and why Muslim women wear hijab or cover their face. After all, there is a large concentration of Muslim community in his Blackburn constituency and until this controversy, the British Muslims saw their member of parliament as being largely sympathetic to them, despite their resentment over the government’s Iraq policy.

Besides, what is secularism, the cornerstone of Western democracy, if not non-interference with individuals’ religious beliefs and cultural practices? If some Muslim women choose to wear the veil, how does it affect their relationship with the state or the society at large? Or for that matter, why should governments, ministers or society get all worked up over an individual’s religious beliefs or cultural practices, unless they affect public peace or order in the country?

How is it anybody’s business, if Aishah Azmi wears veil in her school in the presence of her male colleagues? As she has sensibly pointed out in her defence, her students have never complained about her Muslim veil coming in the way of her communication with them. Why are Blair’s ministers — and with them the rest of Europe — getting so worked up then?

Ironically enough, liberal and secular Europe has no problem with in-your-face nudity on newspaper front pages and in public places — flaunted as individual freedom or art. But eyebrows are raised when a woman exercises her individual right to protect herself and her identity by covering her head or face. And from Jack Straw to Phil Woolas, every politician worth his salt rushes to condemn the ‘sacrilege’! This is nothing but moral and intellectual duplicity. Instead of panning the Muslim veil as decadent or a challenge to its secular ethos, Europe should celebrate its religious and cultural diversity.
OTHER STORIES
  Was the old lot smarter?
  UAE: good as gold
  Here come the talks
  Good call by RTA
  Rethinking on a new Iraq
  SpotGate
+ MORE STORIES
Khaleej Times on Facebook
Khaleej Times Services
© 2010 Khaleej Times, All rights reserved